Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 37(7): e24889, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been widely used for many pathogen detection. However, PCR technology still suffers from long detection time and insufficient sensitivity. Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) is a powerful nucleic acid detection tool with high sensitivity and amplification efficiency, but its complex probes and inability of multiplex detection hinder the further application of this technology. METHODS: In this study, we developed and validated the multiplex reverse transcription recombinase-aided PCR (multiplex RT-RAP) assay for human adenovirus 3 (HADV3), human adenovirus 7 (HADV7), and human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) within 1 h with Human RNaseP protein as a reference gene to monitor the whole process. RESULTS: Using recombinant plasmids, the sensitivity of multiplex RT-RAP for the detection of HADV3, HADV7, and HRSV was 18, 3, and 18 copies per reaction, respectively. The multiplex RT-RAP showed no cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses, demonstrating its good specificity. A total of 252 clinical specimens were tested by multiplex RT-RAP and the results were found to be consistent with those of corresponding RT-qPCR assays. After testing serial dilutions of selected positive specimens, the detection sensitivity of multiplex RT-RAP was two to eightfold higher than that of corresponding RT-qPCR. CONCLUSION: We conclude the multiplex RT-RAP is a robust, rapid, highly sensitive, and specific assay with the potential to be used in the screening of clinical samples with low viral load.


Asunto(s)
Adenovirus Humanos , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Humanos , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/genética , Adenovirus Humanos/genética , Transcripción Reversa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
China CDC Wkly ; 4(23): 504-508, 2022 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1893721

RESUMEN

Introduction: Recently, a local cluster epidemic has occurred in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province. Failure to promptly identify patients with fever in rural areas was the major reason for this epidemic. Methods: We presented the field evaluation of a new real-time reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) kit incorporating an endogenous internal control in a single-tube format, completed at the Hebei CDC from January 17, 2021 to January 27, 2021. Results: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of RT-RAA assay using automatic extracted RNA of 808 clinical samples. Compared with reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), RT-RAA kit achieved 92.41% sensitivity, 98.78% specificity and a 96.29% coincidence rate, demonstrating an excellent agreement between the RT-RAA assay and qRT-PCR assay. Furthermore, 58 samples were extracted using a manual extraction method within 5 minutes, but only samples with high nucleic acid concentration (cycle threshold value not higher than 32) could be stably detected. Discussion: The RT-RAA is more suitable to meet the needs of rapid, sensitive, and accurate detection in community-level medical institutions.

3.
China CDC Wkly ; 3(46): 973-976, 2021 Nov 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1513533

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The best approach to preventing the importation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is enhancing the detection capacity at customs. The rapid detection is of utmost importance and therefore highly demanded. METHODS: We conducted a field validation study of a duplex real-time reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) assay in Zhoushan and Hangzhou customs, in Zhejiang Province, China. The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay kit routinely used at customs was used in parallel, and the duration the two methods took to complete a specific number of samples was compared. RESULTS: Among 506 samples collected, RT-RAA results were consistent with the RT-PCR results. The sensitivity and specificity were 100%, the total coincidence rate was 100%, and the Kappa value was 1 (P<0.05) for both methods. The RT-RAA kit took a significantly shorter time in testing the 20-200 samples than the RT-PCR kit. DISCUSSION: The RT-RAA detection method is more efficient and suitable for use at customs than RT-PCR assay to realize rapid customs clearance of 200 or fewer samples.

4.
China CDC Wkly ; 3(21): 448-453, 2021 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1237077

RESUMEN

Background: COVID-19 infection is a major public health problem worldwide, and the D614G mutation enhances the infectivity of COVID-19.Methods: A probe-directed recombinase amplification (PDRA) assay was discussed to detect the D614G mutation at 39 ℃ for 30 min. The sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the PDRA were evaluated by D614 and G614 recombinant plasmids. The clinical performance of PDRA assay was validated by testing of 53 previously confirmed COVID-19 positive RNAs and 10 negative samples. Direct sequencing was carried out in parallel for comparison.Result: With good reproducibility and specificity, the PDRA assay worked well with the concentration in the range of 103-107 copies/reaction. Compared with direct sequencing as a reference, the recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) assay obtained 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity using clinical samples.Conclusions: A rapid, convenient, sensitive, and specific method to detect D614G mutation was developed, which offers a useful tool to monitor mutations in COVID-19 virus RNA.

5.
Anal Chem ; 92(13): 9399-9404, 2020 07 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-342738

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a public health emergency. The reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) test is currently considered as the gold standard in the laboratory for the etiological detection of COVID-19. However, qRT-PCR results could be false-negative due to the inadequate sensitivity of qRT-PCR. In this study, we have developed and evaluated a novel one-step single-tube nested quantitative real-time PCR (OSN-qRT-PCR) assay for the highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 targeting the ORF1ab and N genes. The sensitivity of the OSN-qRT-PCR assay was 1 copy/reaction and 10-fold higher than that of the commercial qRT-PCR kit (10 copies/reaction). The clinical performance of the OSN-qRT-PCR assay was evaluated using 181 clinical samples. Among them, 14 qRT-PCR-negative samples (7 had no repetitive results and 7 had no cycle threshold (CT) values) were detected by OSN-qRT-PCR. Moreover, the 7 qRT-PCR-positives in the qRT-PCR gray zone (CT values of ORF1ab ranged from 37.48 to 39.07, and CT values of N ranged from 37.34 to 38.75) were out of the gray zone and thus were deemed to be positive by OSN-qRT-PCR, indicating that the positivity of these samples is confirmative. Compared to the qRT-PCR kit, the OSN-qRT-PCR assay revealed higher sensitivity and specificity, showing better suitability to clinical applications for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral load.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside/genética , Pandemias , Fosfoproteínas , Neumonía Viral/virología , Poliproteínas , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Proteínas Virales/genética
6.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection ; 2020.
Artículo | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-276597

RESUMEN

Objectives To evaluate the performance of an ultra-fast single-tube nucleic acid isothermal amplification detection assay for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using clinical samples from multiple centers. Methods A reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) assay for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted within 15minutesat39°C with portable instruments after addition of extracted RNA. The clinical performance of RT-RAA assay was evaluated using 947 clinical samples from five institutions in four regions of China, and the approved commercial real-time fluorescent RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) kits were used for parallel detection. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-RAA were compared and analyzed. Results The RT-RAA test results of 926 samples were consistent with those of qRT-PCR (330 were positive, 596 were negative) and 21 were inconsistent. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-RAA was 97.63% [330/338, 95% confidence interval (CI): 95.21 to 98.90] and 97.87% (596/609, 95% CI: 96.28 to 98.81), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 96.21% (330/343, 95% CI: 93.45 to 97.88), and 98.68% (596/604, 95% CI: 97.30 to 99.38), respectively. The total coincidence rate was 97.78% (926/947, 95% CI: 96.80 to 98.70) and the Kappa was 0.952 (P <0.05). Conclusion With comparable sensitivity and specificity to the commercial qRT-PCR kits, RT-RAA assay for SARS-CoV-2 exhibited distinctive advantages of simplicity and rapidity in terms of operation and turn-around time.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA